![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:12 • Filed to: Oppo Demographics | ![]() | ![]() |
This is how our age's break down (from a sample of 113, I've had great response!):
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Hit the !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! tag for more! Feel free to respond to this with your age if you'd like me to add it to my spreadsheet (all I collect is age, nothing more).
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:18 |
|
We're a bunch o' young uns aren't we (present party excluded :P)
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:18 |
|
Somehow I missed all the surveys.
23, but 24 in less than a month, so do with that as you will
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:19 |
|
My 5th grader is learning average, median and mode. I understand average, but what is median vs. mode? And, will this be on the test?
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:19 |
|
just turned 26
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:20 |
|
I'm 20.
Still feel like I'm 17 though.
Also is below 21 ages 18-21? and same for 21 and up? 21-30 years old and so forth?
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:21 |
|
I'm about to hit the big 3.0. Age breaks down the way I figured it would.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:23 |
|
I'm 32.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:24 |
|
Median is the strip down the middle of the road.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:24 |
|
This is a cool project. Based on this data, values of manual wagons and Miata's are going to skyrocket in 5-9 years once the 21-30 y/o's get some disposable income.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:25 |
|
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/meanmo…
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:27 |
|
23. Skewing a little younger than I thought it would but not by much
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:29 |
|
nope, everything is exactly as it says, anything 21 and below, anything 18 and below, anything 30 and up and so forth.
To get 40 to 50, just do 11-4=7 people are age 40 - 49.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:30 |
|
Mean is the average. Median is the middle number. Mode is the most frequent number. :)
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:30 |
|
Just to clarify, is this a new entry?
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:30 |
|
Is this a new entry?
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:31 |
|
haha, I think so! Also Diesel demand should be skyrocketing.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:31 |
|
yup!
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:32 |
|
just to clarify, to get 21 - 29, you have subtract the 30 and up, so that makes 89-44=45 people.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:37 |
|
lol still pretty much the same, we are now 28.22.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:37 |
|
Oh right! I guess I'll just buy 1 Miata then instead of 4. Thanks!
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:38 |
|
I am 22.
Nice project Yowen, I hope you will get an even better sample.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:42 |
|
Thanks, I am such an unbelievable nerd for anything statistics.
Car sales stats, fuck yes. Oppo Age Demographics, fuck yes. MPG tracking, fuck yes.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:44 |
|
43.
Excuse me while I sip this Metamucil and ease into my barcalounger.
Whippersnappers, all of ya.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:46 |
|
Nice, I like reading statistics, but only do them when needed. It would be nice if you do something else, like what is the average fuel efficiency of the Oppo car fleet.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:50 |
|
I'm 17.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:55 |
|
18
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:55 |
|
Haha, that'd be a fun one. I'll give it some thought, perhaps also average horsepower.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:56 |
|
Now, a median chart of the ages of the reader's cars. Coming up on 40 for the Bug. Dang.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 15:57 |
|
I'm thinking about doing another one of these surveys soon, perhaps hp, mpg's or age of cars.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:04 |
|
I am 20! Add me up on that thang!
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:06 |
|
That's what I told him, but I also said that he probably shouldn't put that answer on the test.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:11 |
|
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:13 |
|
You bring the avg to 28.04. You are entry number 121.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:17 |
|
Another 21-29 here. I'm 22 to be more specific.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:37 |
|
I was only half-joking. The median is the middle value, so the strip down the middle of the road being called the median helps remember.
I'm guessing a fifth grader's a bit young to understand the link between la mode and the mode being the most 'popular/fashionable' number in the list.
What helps with all this kind of thing is if you actually understand why, rather than just trying to remember definitions. When I was at school the sets of numbers they demonstrated with were really dumb, leaving me wondering why you'd use any average other than the mean. When you have a situation where it's actually appropriate, it makes much more sense.
A good example is the average number of wheels on a car. The mean is a hair under four, because there are a few three-wheelers out there, and so-on, but nearly no cars with more than four. The mode, though, is four. If you're a wheel/tyre manufacturer, and want to know how many tyres to package in a set, it's the mode that's useful to you, not the mean.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 16:40 |
|
That's a great description, since I have always wondered why those other measurements would be useful. Thanks.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 17:12 |
|
Younger than I would have expected based on post content. Good on us
![]() 11/20/2013 at 17:39 |
|
"Hello Mom? It's Me. Yup, it finally happened.. I'm above average. I know, right? Well.... I just thought I would let you know.... Love you, too."
![]() 11/20/2013 at 17:56 |
|
It is.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 18:10 |
|
hahaha, good one!
![]() 11/20/2013 at 18:10 |
|
k, thanks. Didn't ask that just to rub it in, haha.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 18:22 |
|
14
![]() 11/20/2013 at 19:22 |
|
I'm ok with it. I figure I'm due for a mid-life crisis.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 20:09 |
|
I read your reply to my son, who sort of understood, but something caught my attention that I missed the first time I read it. You wrote,
leaving me wondering why you'd use any average other than the mean.
and it struck me then that mean, median and mode are all averages. I was always under the impression that mean and average were the same thing. So if I read you correctly, mean is a type of average, in the way that median and mode are also types of averages.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 21:49 |
|
17
![]() 11/20/2013 at 21:50 |
|
Second I turn 18, dad's ES350 is getting traded in for a Miata and brown wagon.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 21:56 |
|
alright, ill help lower this avg age. Im 21.
![]() 11/20/2013 at 22:40 |
|
19
![]() 11/21/2013 at 11:04 |
|
Normally when people say average, they mean the mean, but in fact there are lots of types of averages - many more than just the three common ones.
Statisticians talk about a 'central tendency' of a data set, but what they're actually on about is simply the most typical item in a list - the one that best represents the whole list.
Obviously, what is 'best' depends on why you're trying to generalise the results in the first place.
There's a whole list of different averages here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measures_…
It's not exhaustive, by any means. The point of some of them is more obvious than others.
" Truncated mean – the arithmetic mean of data values after a certain number or proportion of the highest and lowest data values have been discarded."
That one's relatively easy to imagine a use for. Say you wanted the average of the tyre profiles people use, but you wanted to know what was typical, so you excluded the stancers with ridiculously stretched tyres at one end, and the mudders with huge off-road tyres at the other.
Wikipedia actually has a decent explanation for why you might use the geometric mean:
For example, the geometric mean can give a meaningful "average" to compare two companies which are each rated at 0 to 5 for their environmental sustainability, and are rated at 0 to 100 for their financial viability. If an arithmetic mean was used instead of a geometric mean, the financial viability is given more weight because its numeric range is larger- so a small percentage change in the financial rating (e.g. going from 80 to 90) makes a much larger difference in the arithmetic mean than a large percentage change in environmental sustainability (e.g. going from 2 to 5). The use of a geometric mean "normalizes" the ranges being averaged, so that no range dominates the weighting, and a given percentage change in any of the properties has the same effect on the geometric mean. So, a 20% change in environmental sustainability from 4 to 4.8 has the same effect on the geometric mean as a 20% change in financial viability from 60 to 72.
Another average you might be familiar with from amps and stereos and so-on is RMS. That's used with electric current because AC is positive half the time and negative half the time, so the mean would be zero. RMS turns all the values positive, so gives the result you'd naturally think of as the average electric current in the system.
One thing that maybe isn't obvious is that you might use different averages on the same data, when looking at different things.
Imagine you're a company with a load of clients, and you do a customer satisfaction survey. You could just take a straight-up mean. If you wanted to take into account that some clients were bigger than others, you could use a weighted mean, where you multiply their satisfaction score by their bill. If you wanted to just analyse the middle-ranking clients, you might go for a truncated mean.
At the end of the day, all statistical techniques are just ways of looking at a big pile of data and trying to summarise it. How you summarise it depends on what you want the summary for.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 12:05 |
|
Hey can you do another one of these? I wasn't on here when they happened? I'm 15
![]() 01/16/2014 at 12:31 |
|
If I do another it'll be for a different figure.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 13:46 |
|
That makes two of us. Scary to think there are as many under 18 here as there are in their 40s.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 19:24 |
|
17